الطعن بقرار فرض العقوبة الانضباطية على موظفي العتبات المقدسة في العراق دراسة تحليلية في ظل التشريعات العراقية

الملخص

   The Constitution guarantees the right of litigation for all workers in sectors of the state , meaning that all decisions to impose the penalty shall be subject to appeal before the competent authorities in Iraq eliminate staff court is considered by the competent authority to consider appeals filed by employees against administrative bodies to which they belong her decisions.

Consequently, the Secretary General of the Holy thresholds decisions are considered inconclusive and cannot be challenged and that it is contrary to Article 100 of the Constitution that prevented the prohibition of any immunization orders and administrative decisions , as though many legal irregularities that the Secretary-General in violation of the law, such as investigative councils measures to raise the recommendation.

We would like to ask several questions in our present them , what are the sanctions that are imposed on the holy shrines staff , and the competent authority to impose , and the principles imposed by the controller, is it permissible to challenge imposed by the decisions , and who is competent to do so, and what the impact of the appeal by the impact , is it permissible discrimination as a result of the appeal once more .

We have adopted in the writing of research on the analytical method and extrapolation of legal texts ; to the extent of its agreement with the constitutional provisions and clarify what where the weaknesses and strengths , as well as comparative approach , as required , to reach the highest level of legal precision of the specificity of the holy shrines of being civilized and religious entities including the bodies of the pure imams " peace be upon them ."